Minerals Plan: Key Issues & Options

Derby & Derbyshire Minerals Core Strategy: Key Issues & Options Questionnaire

Responses

List of answers to the specified question
NameOptionTextDate
Peter Toon - Hanson UK Option 1: Make an estimate of provision beyond 2020 based on a straight line projection of the current agreed apportionments (i.e. the annual apportionments for crushed rock and sand & gravel remain the same for the years from 2020 - 2030 as they are from 2005 - 2020). 28 Sep 2010 11:39
Henry Folkard - British Mounta… Other (please specify) Both options will give an inflated figure. Inclination would therefore be to use whchever gave the lower figure and qualify it with abundant health warnings to the extent that you could safeguard the option of retreat from it if a better figure presented itself. 18 Aug 2010 14:24
Henry Folkard - British Mounta… Both options will give an inflated figure. Inclination would therefore be to use whchever gave the lower figure and qualify it with abundant health warnings to the extent that you could safeguard the option of retreat from it if a better figure presented itself. 18 Aug 2010 14:24
John Bradshaw - Tarmac Option 1: Make an estimate of provision beyond 2020 based on a straight line projection of the current agreed apportionments (i.e. the annual apportionments for crushed rock and sand & gravel remain the same for the years from 2020 - 2030 as they are from 2005 - 2020). 13 Aug 2010 14:46
Mr Bowen - South Derbyshire Di… Option 2: Use an average figure of recent annual production rates to calculate annual apportionment figures from 2020 - 2030. 12 Aug 2010 14:43
Karen Miller - National Trust Other (please specify) Neither Option is wholly supported. It is considered that Option 2 is the most appropriate starting point, but that this needs to be modified to include an assessment of the potential reduction in need that will be achieved as a result of Objective E which should result in a reduced requirement to exploit primary resources.
10 Aug 2010 16:10
Karen Miller - National Trust Neither Option is wholly supported. It is considered that Option 2 is the most appropriate starting point, but that this needs to be modified to include an assessment of the potential reduction in need that will be achieved as a result of Objective E which should result in a reduced requirement to exploit primary resources.
10 Aug 2010 16:10
Mark North - Mineral Products… Option 1: Make an estimate of provision beyond 2020 based on a straight line projection of the current agreed apportionments (i.e. the annual apportionments for crushed rock and sand & gravel remain the same for the years from 2020 - 2030 as they are from 2005 - 2020). 10 Aug 2010 14:03
Jenna Conway - Tarmac Option 1: Make an estimate of provision beyond 2020 based on a straight line projection of the current agreed apportionments (i.e. the annual apportionments for crushed rock and sand & gravel remain the same for the years from 2020 - 2030 as they are from 2005 - 2020). 02 Aug 2010 14:59
Planning - Cemex Option 1: Make an estimate of provision beyond 2020 based on a straight line projection of the current agreed apportionments (i.e. the annual apportionments for crushed rock and sand & gravel remain the same for the years from 2020 - 2030 as they are from 2005 - 2020). 02 Aug 2010 13:32
Next pageLast page